How we check
What a report turns up, and how each line in it is traced back to a public record. Sources are ranked, conflicts are shown side by side, and we never give a verdict.
What a report surfaces
Four entries from our illustrative sample reports. The projects and figures are invented; the kinds of record are the ones we find, and that a buyer would want to read before paying a token amount.
| Project | What the record shows | Source type | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Loomworks ResidencesLower Parel · Illustrative | Upper floors held to be built beyond the approved height | High Court order | 2016 |
| Loomworks ResidencesLower Parel · Illustrative | A “full OC” claim; the record shows one for the lower floors only | Broker listing vs. municipal record | 2026 |
| Harbourline TowersKanjurmarg East · Illustrative | The Kanjurmarg landfill 0.8–1.3 km from the site boundary | Measured from map outlines | 2026 |
| Harbourline TowersKanjurmarg East · Illustrative | Built on a former chemical works; no soil-clearance record found | Company filings; public records search | 2015 |
How every line is checked
What we publish
The Supreme Court has stayed the ruling that declared the Kanjurmarg landfill site a protected forest.
What the source says
“SC stays Bombay HC's verdict that declared Mumbai's Kanjurmarg land 'protected forest'”
Matched to source · checked 23 Sep 2026
Sources are ranked
Courts and regulators count as fact. News counts as reported. Listings and broker sites are claims, and never used alone.
Conflicts are shown, not settled
When two sources disagree on a number, you see both, side by side. We never pick one quietly.
No verdicts
We don’t say buy or avoid. We say what the record shows, and where it says it.
Unverifiable means refunded
If a report can’t meet our evidence bar, you get your money back automatically.